erdős #524
For any let (where ). What is the correct order of magnitude (for almost all ) for
Worked, still open.
analysis · open · 0 attempts
use this record
vela registry pull vfr_37aec80d874a0239vela reproduce examples/erdos-problemsevidence
unverified AI candidates (2)
gpt-erdos · GPT-5.2 Pro + Deep Research · unverified
Let [ a_k(t):=(-1)^{\epsilon_k(t)}\in{\pm1},\qquad P_n(x):=\sum_{k=1}^n a_k(t),x^k, \qquad M_n(t)=\sup_{x\in[-1,1]}|P_n(x)|. ] For Lebesgue-a.e. (t\in(0,1)), the bits (\epsilon_k(t)) are i.i.d. Bernoulli($1/2$), hence ((a_k(t))) are i.i.d. Rademacher [[nomath]]($\pm1$ with prob. $1/2$)[[/nomath]]. (We ignore the dyadic…
candidate solution ↗llm-hunter · gpt pro 5.2 · unverified
1 LLM attack(s) recorded (gpt pro 5.2); unverified.
candidate solution ↗links
Create a formalisation here · link
status
open