If $\mathcal{F}$ is a finite set of finite graphs then $\mathrm{ex}(n;\mathcal{F})$ is the maximum number of edges a graph on $n$ vertices can have without containing any subgraphs from $\mathcal{F}$. Note that it is trivial that $\mathrm{ex}(n;\mathcal{F})\le \mathrm{ex}(n;G)$ for every $G\in \mathcal{F}$. Is it true that, for every $\mathcal{F}$, if there is a bipartite graph in $\mathcal{F}$ then there exists some bipartite $G\in \mathcal{F}$ such that$$\mathrm{ex}(n;G){\ll }_{\mathcal{F}}\mathrm{ex}(n;\mathcal{F})?$$