Vela

Is there a necessary and sufficient condition for a sequence of integers that ensures there exists a primitive sequence (i.e. no element divides another) with for all ?In particular, is this always possible if there are no non-trivial solutions to ?Similarly, find necessary and sufficient conditions on a sequence that ensure there exists a primitive set such thatfor every .

Worked, still open.

number theory · open · 0 attempts

use this record

vela registry pull vfr_37aec80d874a0239
vela reproduce examples/erdos-problems

evidence

unverified AI candidates (2)

gpt-erdos · GPT-5.2 Pro + Deep Research · unverified

What you’re asking for is (essentially verbatim) an old Erdős–Sárközy–Szemerédi problem, and in full generality there is **no known necessary-and-sufficient criterion** at present. ([Erdős Problems][1])

candidate solution ↗

llm-hunter · gpt pro 5.2 · unverified

1 LLM attack(s) recorded (gpt pro 5.2); unverified.

candidate solution ↗

status

open

notary

vela reproduce examples/erdos-problems
  • packet.json · sha256 3ed865382c958d069ef4a2ebe81cf58e2af66e602a21f61fd76c2b547a75181f

finding.noted · reviewer:will-blair · 1 day

renders the record as of vev_d199cb2e · 1,338 events · hub

Search Vela

Jump to a section, signal, campaign, document, primitive, work path, frontier, record index, atlas, constellation, agent, capability, or full-state search.