proposed
reason
Candidate claim vc_d11ea0453b020966 imported from artifact packet cap_61973ee16b553d57
finding type
open_question
proposed confidence
0.99
confidence basis
agent-imported candidate claim; reviewer acceptance required
frontiers / frontier
e1271/1271 · statement.attested · reviewer:will-blair · 2026-06-10 · null→null
Reviewable change
back to reviewErdős Problem #501 remains OPEN. Statement: For every $x \in \mathbb{R}$ let $A_x \subset \mathbb{R}$ be a bounded set with outer measure $< 1$. Must there exist an infinite independent set, that is, some infinite $X \subseteq \mathbb{R}$ such that $x \notin A_y$ for all $x \neq y \in X$? If the sets $A_x$ are closed and have measure $< 1$, then must there exist an independent set of size $3$? Known results: Erdős–Hajnal [ErHa60] proved the existence of arbitrarily large finite independent sets. Hechler [He72] showed the answer is **no** assuming the continuum hypothesis. Topics: combinatorics, set theory. Erdős prize: no. Statement is machine-verified in Lean (formal-conjectures). OEIS: N/A.
accept gate
1 of 4 on recordtimeline
vpr_2183116a1007e07bCandidate claim vc_d11ea0453b020966 imported from artifact packet cap_61973ee16b553d57null→4e571011vev_576fcd8062db0145Candidate claim vc_d11ea0453b020966 imported from artifact packet cap_61973ee16b553d57proposed
reason
Candidate claim vc_d11ea0453b020966 imported from artifact packet cap_61973ee16b553d57
finding type
open_question
proposed confidence
0.99
confidence basis
agent-imported candidate claim; reviewer acceptance required
provenance
proposed by
agent:erdos-spine-ingest
actor type
agent
created at
2026-05-30
target type
finding
affected
inspect finding →Erdős Problem #501 remains OPEN. Statement: For every $x \in \mathbb{R}$ let $A_x \subset \mathbb{R}$ be a bounded set with outer measure $< 1$. Must there exist an infinite independent set, that is, some infinite $X \subseteq \mathbb{R}$ such that $x \notin A_y$ for all $x \neq y \in X$? If the sets $A_x$ are closed and have measure $< 1$, then must there exist an independent set of size $3$? Known results: Erdős–Hajnal [ErHa60] proved the existence of arbitrarily large finite independent sets. Hechler [He72] showed the answer is **no** assuming the continuum hypothesis. Topics: combinatorics, set theory. Erdős prize: no. Statement is machine-verified in Lean (formal-conjectures). OEIS: N/A.
vf_fccad3dc897074b9Read-only frontier; diff not recomputed.
Erdős problems frontier receives a reviewable source, finding, caveat, replication, evaluation, or proof-affecting edit.
The packet names affected record objects, evidence, rationale, reviewer-facing fields, and expected proof impact.
Schema, provenance, benchmark, contradiction, and proof checks decide whether the request is ready to read.
A steward accepts, rejects, caveats, revises, or retracts the request under an inspectable identity.
Only the accepted event mutates frontier state. Atlases, constellations, and search update from that record state.
Jump to a section, signal, campaign, document, primitive, work path, frontier, record index, atlas, constellation, agent, capability, or full-state search.