proposed
reason
Candidate claim vc_a5a2f7d21f65aba4 imported from artifact packet cap_61973ee16b553d57
finding type
theoretical
proposed confidence
0.99
confidence basis
agent-imported candidate claim; reviewer acceptance required
frontiers / frontier
e1271/1271 · statement.attested · reviewer:will-blair · 2026-06-10 · null→null
Reviewable change
back to reviewErdős Problem #884 has been DISPROVED (a counterexample is known). Statement: For a natural number n, let $1 = d_1 < \dotsc < d_{\tau(n)} = n$ denote the divisors of $n$ in increasing order. Does it hold that $\sum_{1 \le i < j \le \tau(n)} \frac{1}{d_j - d_i} \ll 1 + \sum_{1 \le i < \tau(n)} \frac{1}{d_{i + 1} - d_i}$ for $n \to \infty`, i.e. $\sum_{1 \le i < j \le \tau(n)} \frac{1}{d_j - d_i} \in O \left( 1 + \sum_{1 \le i < \tau(n)} \frac{1}{d_{i + 1} - d_i}) \right)$? This conjecture has been **disproved**: - In September 2025, Terence Tao gave a conditional _negative_ answer assuming the prime tuples conjecture, see `erdos_884_false_of_hardy_littlewood` for this implication. - Daniel Larsen subsequently gave an [unconditional disproof](https://github.com/Larsen-Daniel/Erdos-884/blob/main/884.pdf). *Reference:* [erdosproblems.com/884](https://www.erdosproblems.com/884) Topics: number theory, divisors. Erdős prize: no. Statement is machine-verified in Lean (formal-conjectures). OEIS: N/A.
accept gate
1 of 4 on recordtimeline
vpr_ceb43de800efb758Candidate claim vc_a5a2f7d21f65aba4 imported from artifact packet cap_61973ee16b553d57null→66650469vev_915ba328f388440fCandidate claim vc_a5a2f7d21f65aba4 imported from artifact packet cap_61973ee16b553d57proposed
reason
Candidate claim vc_a5a2f7d21f65aba4 imported from artifact packet cap_61973ee16b553d57
finding type
theoretical
proposed confidence
0.99
confidence basis
agent-imported candidate claim; reviewer acceptance required
provenance
proposed by
agent:erdos-spine-ingest
actor type
agent
created at
2026-05-30
target type
finding
affected
inspect finding →Erdős Problem #884 has been DISPROVED (a counterexample is known). Statement: For a natural number n, let $1 = d_1 < \dotsc < d_{\tau(n)} = n$ denote the divisors of $n$ in increasing order. Does it hold that $\sum_{1 \le i < j \le \tau(n)} \frac{1}{d_j - d_i} \ll 1 + \sum_{1 \le i < \tau(n)} \frac{1}{d_{i + 1} - d_i}$ for $n \to \infty`, i.e. $\sum_{1 \le i < j \le \tau(n)} \frac{1}{d_j - d_i} \in O \left( 1 + \sum_{1 \le i < \tau(n)} \frac{1}{d_{i + 1} - d_i}) \right)$? This conjecture has been **disproved**: - In September 2025, Terence Tao gave a conditional _negative_ answer assuming the prime tuples conjecture, see `erdos_884_false_of_hardy_littlewood` for this implication. - Daniel Larsen subsequently gave an [unconditional disproof](https://github.com/Larsen-Daniel/Erdos-884/blob/main/884.pdf). *Reference:* [erdosproblems.com/884](https://www.erdosproblems.com/884) Topics: number theory, divisors. Erdős prize: no. Statement is machine-verified in Lean (formal-conjectures). OEIS: N/A.
vf_a3424c338522cb4bRead-only frontier; diff not recomputed.
Erdős problems frontier receives a reviewable source, finding, caveat, replication, evaluation, or proof-affecting edit.
The packet names affected record objects, evidence, rationale, reviewer-facing fields, and expected proof impact.
Schema, provenance, benchmark, contradiction, and proof checks decide whether the request is ready to read.
A steward accepts, rejects, caveats, revises, or retracts the request under an inspectable identity.
Only the accepted event mutates frontier state. Atlases, constellations, and search update from that record state.
Jump to a section, signal, campaign, document, primitive, work path, frontier, record index, atlas, constellation, agent, capability, or full-state search.