proposed
reason
Candidate claim vc_f4d6defc70020a0c imported from artifact packet cap_61973ee16b553d57
finding type
open_question
proposed confidence
0.99
confidence basis
agent-imported candidate claim; reviewer acceptance required
frontiers / frontier
e1271/1271 · statement.attested · reviewer:will-blair · 2026-06-10 · null→null
Reviewable change
back to reviewErdős Problem #1051 has status 'proved (lean)'. Statement: Is it true that if $a_0 < a_1 < a_2 < \cdots$ is a strictly increasing sequence of integers with $\liminf a_n^{1/2^n} > 1$, then the series $\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{1}{a_n \cdot a_{n+1}}$ is irrational? This was solved in the affirmative by Aletheia [Fe26]. This was extended by Barreto, Kang, Kim, Kovač, and Zhang [BKKKZ26], who essentially give a complete answer: if $\phi=\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2}$ is the golden ratio and $1\leq a_1 < a_2 < \cdots$ is a monotonically increasing sequence of integers such that $\limsup a_n^{1/\phi^{n}}=\infty$ then $\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{a_na_{n+1}}$ is irrational. Conversely, for any $1 < C < \infty$ there exists a sequence of integers $1\leq a_1<\cdots$ such that $\lim a_n^{1/\phi^{n}}=C$ where this infinite sum is a rational number. (Further, more general, results are available in [BKKKZ26].) This was formalized in Lean by Baretto. Topics: irrationality. Erdős prize: no. Statement is machine-verified in Lean (formal-conjectures). OEIS: N/A.
accept gate
1 of 4 on recordtimeline
vpr_ef2a2364e670ce45Candidate claim vc_f4d6defc70020a0c imported from artifact packet cap_61973ee16b553d57null→5144e816vev_e906e3267e9339b7Candidate claim vc_f4d6defc70020a0c imported from artifact packet cap_61973ee16b553d57proposed
reason
Candidate claim vc_f4d6defc70020a0c imported from artifact packet cap_61973ee16b553d57
finding type
open_question
proposed confidence
0.99
confidence basis
agent-imported candidate claim; reviewer acceptance required
provenance
proposed by
agent:erdos-spine-ingest
actor type
agent
created at
2026-05-30
target type
finding
affected
inspect finding →Erdős Problem #1051 has status 'proved (lean)'. Statement: Is it true that if $a_0 < a_1 < a_2 < \cdots$ is a strictly increasing sequence of integers with $\liminf a_n^{1/2^n} > 1$, then the series $\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{1}{a_n \cdot a_{n+1}}$ is irrational? This was solved in the affirmative by Aletheia [Fe26]. This was extended by Barreto, Kang, Kim, Kovač, and Zhang [BKKKZ26], who essentially give a complete answer: if $\phi=\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2}$ is the golden ratio and $1\leq a_1 < a_2 < \cdots$ is a monotonically increasing sequence of integers such that $\limsup a_n^{1/\phi^{n}}=\infty$ then $\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{a_na_{n+1}}$ is irrational. Conversely, for any $1 < C < \infty$ there exists a sequence of integers $1\leq a_1<\cdots$ such that $\lim a_n^{1/\phi^{n}}=C$ where this infinite sum is a rational number. (Further, more general, results are available in [BKKKZ26].) This was formalized in Lean by Baretto. Topics: irrationality. Erdős prize: no. Statement is machine-verified in Lean (formal-conjectures). OEIS: N/A.
vf_a566be23717e9a21Read-only frontier; diff not recomputed.
Erdős problems frontier receives a reviewable source, finding, caveat, replication, evaluation, or proof-affecting edit.
The packet names affected record objects, evidence, rationale, reviewer-facing fields, and expected proof impact.
Schema, provenance, benchmark, contradiction, and proof checks decide whether the request is ready to read.
A steward accepts, rejects, caveats, revises, or retracts the request under an inspectable identity.
Only the accepted event mutates frontier state. Atlases, constellations, and search update from that record state.
Jump to a section, signal, campaign, document, primitive, work path, frontier, record index, atlas, constellation, agent, capability, or full-state search.