evidence boundary
supportsfrontiers / frontier
Erdős problems frontier
- id
- vfr_37aec80d874a0239
- license
- CC-BY-4.0
- findings
- 1,256
- accepted core
- 6
- contested
- 0
- links
- 17
- sources
- 1,234
- evidence
- 1,256
- avg conf
- 0.98
e1288/1288 · statement.registered · agent:claude-proxy · 2026-06-10 · null→null
Evidence atom
back to sources{"artifact_id":"va_9bc926d75e4e3881","artifact_packet_id":"cap_61973ee16b553d57","candidate_claim_id":"vc_5237658ef98610c6"}
- id
- vea_0dc5558862075641
- frontier
- Erdős problems frontier
- source
- vs_f1bfd706410d539b
- finding
- vf_608ebe818e8a4906
finding binding
boundopen_question
Erdős Problem #258 has status 'proved (lean)'. Statement: Let $a_n \to \infty$ be a sequence of non-zero natural numbers. Is $\sum_n \frac{d(n)}{(a_1 ... a_n)}$ irrational, where $d(n)$ is the number of divisors of $n$? This was proved affirmatively by Chojecki and GPT-5.4 Pro [Ch26], and formalised in Lean by ster-oc [St26]. Topics: irrationality. Erdős prize: no. Statement is machine-verified in Lean (formal-conjectures). OEIS: N/A.
source binding
source-boundcap_61973ee16b553d57 · vc_5237658ef98610c6
vs_f1bfd706410d539b
review context
unverified1 events
1 reviewable changes and 0 evaluation records target this atom or its bound objects.
statement
{"artifact_id":"va_9bc926d75e4e3881","artifact_packet_id":"cap_61973ee16b553d57","candidate_claim_id":"vc_5237658ef98610c6"}
locator
span:0
extraction method
artifact_to_state_import
support relation
supports
condition refs
vcnd_19c06df9d921e7ba
caveats
No caveats recorded.
Review, event, and evaluation records
2events
vev_ede17a4d16b5906afinding.assertedCandidate claim vc_5237658ef98610c6 imported from artifact packet cap_61973ee16b553d57
reviewer:erdos-db-trust · 2026-05-30
reviewable changes
vpr_3cbc3277692c8bfffinding.addCandidate claim vc_5237658ef98610c6 imported from artifact packet cap_61973ee16b553d57
applied · agent:erdos-spine-ingest · 2026-05-30
evaluations
No evaluation rows are attached.