erdős #142
Let be the largest possible size of a subset of that does not contain any non-trivial -term arithmetic progression. Prove an asymptotic formula for .
Worked, still open.
additive combinatorics · open · prize $10000 · formalized (Lean) · 0 attempts
machinery: additive-combinatorics,arithmetic-progressions,Behrend-construction,density-increment,Szemeredi-theorem,Fourier-analytic-bound
use this record
vela registry pull vfr_37aec80d874a0239vela reproduce examples/erdos-problemsevidence
unverified AI candidates (2)
gpt-erdos · GPT-5.2 Pro + Deep Research · unverified
Fix an integer (k\ge 3). Write ([N]={1,2,\dots,N}). A *non‑trivial* $k$-term arithmetic progression in $[N]$ means [ a,\ a+d,\ a+2d,\ \dots,\ a+(k-1)d ] with (d\neq 0) [[nomath]](so here $d\ge 1$)[[/nomath]].
candidate solution ↗llm-hunter · gpt pro 5.2 · unverified
1 LLM attack(s) recorded (gpt pro 5.2); unverified.
candidate solution ↗formal
AMS 11 · open (literature)
theorem erdos_142 (k : ℕ) : (fun N => (r k N : ℝ)) =Θ[atTop] (answer(sorry) : ℕ → ℝ)formal-conjectures/142.lean ↗
oeis
links
#3If has then must contain arbitrarily long arithmetic progressions?A003002#139Let be the size of the largest subset of which does not contain a non-trivial -term arithmetic progression. Prove that .A003002#140Let be the size of the largest subset of which does not contain a non-trivial -term arithmetic progression. Prove that for every .A003002#201Let be such that any set of integers contains a subset of size at least which does not contain a -term arithmetic progression. Determine the size of . How does it relate to , the size of the largest subset of without a -term arithmetic progression? Is it true thatA003002status
open