erdős #201
Let be such that any set of integers contains a subset of size at least which does not contain a -term arithmetic progression. Determine the size of . How does it relate to , the size of the largest subset of without a -term arithmetic progression? Is it true that
Worked, still open.
additive combinatorics · open · 0 attempts
use this record
vela registry pull vfr_37aec80d874a0239vela reproduce examples/erdos-problemsevidence
unverified AI candidates (2)
gpt-erdos · GPT-5.2 Pro + Deep Research · unverified
Write, for a finite set (A\subset\mathbb Z), [ r_k(A):=\max{|B|:B\subseteq A\text{ and }B\text{ contains no }k\text{-term AP}}. ] Then your quantity is [ G_k(N)=\min_{\substack{A\subset\mathbb Z\ |A|=N}} r_k(A), ] while [ R_k(N)=r_k({1,2,\dots,N}). ]
candidate solution ↗llm-hunter · gpt pro 5.2 · unverified
1 LLM attack(s) recorded (gpt pro 5.2); unverified.
candidate solution ↗oeis
links
Create a formalisation here · link
#3If has then must contain arbitrarily long arithmetic progressions?A003002#139Let be the size of the largest subset of which does not contain a non-trivial -term arithmetic progression. Prove that .A003002#140Let be the size of the largest subset of which does not contain a non-trivial -term arithmetic progression. Prove that for every .A003002#142Let be the largest possible size of a subset of that does not contain any non-trivial -term arithmetic progression. Prove an asymptotic formula for .A003002status
open