record state
frontier-ownedReview status
This finding is part of accepted frontier state. Review events, reviewable changes, and proof state explain how it can change.
unreviewed
frontiers / frontier
Finding bundle
back to stateno incoming links yet
record state
frontier-ownedThis finding is part of accepted frontier state. Review events, reviewable changes, and proof state explain how it can change.
finding statement
finding typeNo entity list is declared.
evidence
source-boundtheoretical · manual state transition
proof impact
packet context2 reviewable changes and 0 evaluation records are attached to this finding id.
Evidence and conditions
method
manual state transition
evidence type
theoretical
conditions
Provenance
source title
LIGO–Virgo O3 glitch analysis and Gravity Spy classifier
authors
reviewer:will-blair
Glitch contamination caused false retractions of ~33% of gravitational wave candidates in LIGO–Virgo O3 observing run, with machine-learning discrimination achieving 75% sensitivity to non-astrophysical glitches.
vs_1072e5348d41530f · manual_curation
outgoing
vf_7046d9dc7dba1a67Machine learning discrimination achieves >75% glitch sensitivity, rivaling or exceeding Bayesian model selection in O3
incoming
No incoming links.
events
vev_0729c2d482929e26finding.assertedManual finding added to frontier state
reviewer:will-blair · 2026-05-29
vev_369f71564a8d739afinding.caveatedVerifier caution: Claim of '~33% false retractions from glitches in O3' is extremely specific but lacks verifiable citation. arXiv:2307.15867 exists and is accessible, but the precise 33% figure cannot be confirmed from the provided source alone. Requires direct paper review.
reviewer:will-blair · 2026-05-29
reviewable changes
vpr_f6d1e35ed4eddfaffinding.addManual finding added to frontier state
applied · reviewer:will-blair · 2026-05-29
vpr_785dae796c7fb9bafinding.caveatVerifier caution: Claim of '~33% false retractions from glitches in O3' is extremely specific but lacks verifiable citation. arXiv:2307.15867 exists and is accessible, but the precise 33% figure cannot be confirmed from the provided source alone. Requires direct paper review.
applied · reviewer:will-blair · 2026-05-29
evaluations
No evaluation record targets this finding id.