source boundary
frontier-owneddeclared
A source record is provenance. It supports a finding only through evidence atoms, extraction spans, and reviewed finding bundles.
frontiers / frontier
Source record
back to sourcessource boundary
frontier-ownedA source record is provenance. It supports a finding only through evidence atoms, extraction spans, and reviewed finding bundles.
finding bindings
record contextFindings bound to this source through source ids, evidence atoms, provenance, or reviewed source-record slots.
evidence atoms
materializedEvidence atoms pin exact spans, measurements, selectors, or curation assertions to the source.
review context
inspectable2 reviewable changes and 0 evaluations are attached through this source or its findings.
Locator and citation
external sourcelocator
title:LIGO–Virgo O3 glitch analysis and Gravity Spy classifier
imported
2026-05-29T02:16:31.462149+00:00
extraction mode
manual_curation
authors
reviewer:will-blair
Caveats
No source-specific caveats are recorded.
Glitch contamination caused false retractions of ~33% of gravitational wave candidates in LIGO–Virgo O3 observing run, with machine-learning discrimination achieving 75% sensitivity to non-astrophysical glitches.
events
vev_0729c2d482929e26finding.assertedManual finding added to frontier state
reviewer:will-blair · 2026-05-29
vev_369f71564a8d739afinding.caveatedVerifier caution: Claim of '~33% false retractions from glitches in O3' is extremely specific but lacks verifiable citation. arXiv:2307.15867 exists and is accessible, but the precise 33% figure cannot be confirmed from the provided source alone. Requires direct paper review.
reviewer:will-blair · 2026-05-29
reviewable changes
vpr_f6d1e35ed4eddfaffinding.addManual finding added to frontier state
applied · reviewer:will-blair · 2026-05-29
vpr_785dae796c7fb9bafinding.caveatVerifier caution: Claim of '~33% false retractions from glitches in O3' is extremely specific but lacks verifiable citation. arXiv:2307.15867 exists and is accessible, but the precise 33% figure cannot be confirmed from the provided source alone. Requires direct paper review.
applied · reviewer:will-blair · 2026-05-29
evaluations
No evaluation rows are attached.